The Trump Era is iconoclastic as much as it is mythoclastic, with one chimera slain after another. But some lies die harder than others.


Alex Nowrasteh, the Cato Institute’s senior immigration policy analyst, is a self-described “Globalist [and] Elitist.” Who better to lecture Americans on patriotism?

Recently, Nowrasteh joined the chorus lambasting Michael Anton’s Washington Post op-ed against birthright citizenship. Nowrasteh carefully couches the term “assimilation” beside patriotic sayings of Ronald Reagan. Because “assimilation” is as effective a process as it has ever been, argues  Nowrasteh, then there really is no reason to fret over mass immigration—let alone birthright citizenship.

But there is nothing patriotic or even “American” about Nowrasteh’s idea of assimilation. This is not a stretch. Assimilation and Americanization are not the same thing to Nowrasteh. He says so himself:

Even though the evidence of immigration assimilation should comfort  skeptics, some have proposed massive new government programs to help  boost immigrant assimilation. However, evidence from the early 20th  century Americanization Movement suggests that such efforts will fail or  that they could even backfire and make new immigrants and their  descendants less culturally and patriotically American.

“In the absence of empirical evidence supporting the effectiveness of  the Americanization Movement,” claims Nowrasteh, “its supporters should  be agnostic instead of calling for its revival."

Read the full story in American Greatness.